Beiträge von darkesthour

    Tom!

    Zitat von Tom94;149263

    Ich bin zwar immernoch der Meinung, dass das Leechen der Form ebenfalls nicht von Einfallsreichtum zeugt... (und dass man die Form, so wie sie bei dem Screenshot ist auch leicht per HEX aus meinem Antihack zaubern kann...)

    ...aber gespannt bin ich dennoch.
    Ob es was wird, mal sehen, auf jeden Fall werdet ihr, falls ihr soweit kommt, noch so einige Hürden bemerken, glaubt mir. ;)

    Denkt auch bei yannikMAMAs Crash Packet daran:
    Einfach das konkrete Packet zu blocken schützt nicht, man muss nur geringe Änderungen vornehmen und kann schon wieder den Server crashen ohne, dass das Packet geblockt wird. :p

    FAZIT:
    - Skeptisch da bis jetzt nur Form da ist (und diese geleecht)
    - Zeugt von keinem großen Einfallsreichtum
    - Jedoch gespannt auf das Ergebnis, wenn es da ist :>

    Looks like hex edited version of your anti hack if you ask me. pthreadVCL.dll isn't that your dll? correct me if wrong. If it is then the owner of this could have just changed name to make it look a little more legit at least.

    Zitat von Pumaaa;149721

    As Aeonsofts Devs are definitively DUMB, you should try passwords like kikugalanet , Aeonsoft , Neuz , MUDRA , Project Mudra, Masquerade and so on.

    To be honest that's what i thought, but maybe the devs have a little common sense. Not the managers of the server. What kind of person would put a source code on his svn if he didn't think it had sufficient encryptions used. Using a common password would just ruin it. Well this is aeonsoft so i like most people did try and also converted what i could to Korean and still no success. The devs may be a little smarter.

    Zitat von SerusUriel;149655

    The DLL files seem to be packed with another packing method.
    which could alter the Cryption method correct me if im wrong

    But to the Pros outside there: Is it possible to walk straight through the wall instead of opening the door?

    What i mean is: When im not mistaken the PW is only a switch that triggers in 2 ways 1st one when correct 2nd one when wrong. So when the password is correct it calls the funtion to decrypt the archive. If my idea is correct, couldnt you circumvate the way this trigger is called and set it to a way it always calls like that the PW is correct?

    Cause 7zip in my test always loads 3 different threads 1 to open 1 to check the pw and 1 to open the file after the PW is correct with an intermodular call and one user32 call with a postmessageA to open the "PW is Wrong Dialog".

    I only need an answer if this what im trying to do is possible?

    I don't think that way is possible. Because its the files inside that are encrypted. If you did that you would just end up with the files but still encrypted i do believe. The password is used to decrypt the files inside the archive. Without it the only way is to crack the AES encryption but there is no publicly/if any known way to crack it.

    I have obtained the source for the official files, cola, neuz.exe and other tools which gala/aeonsoft use for managing ingame/creating stuff through a devs svn. The archive is 7z with an aes 256 encryption which i have no idea how to crack. I spoke to a friend at college who said that a bruteforce and a dictionary attack would be useless if the password is a little complex due to the time it could/would take. Also dude to the complexness of the cytology used in aes encryption it is not impossible but extremely hard. My friend said the only way he could crack it would be a "plain text" attack. Which involves needed a file from the archive that is identical. I know the source for the neuz.exe is available somewhere over the net. If anyone has could someone share it/ hint to where it is because some files will be identical and would allow the "plain text" attack to "work".